Archives

  • 2018-07
  • 2018-10
  • 2018-11
  • 2019-04
  • 2019-05
  • 2019-06
  • 2019-07
  • 2019-08
  • 2019-09
  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2019-12
  • 2020-01
  • 2020-02
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-04
  • 2020-05
  • 2020-06
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2020-09
  • 2020-10
  • 2020-11
  • 2020-12
  • 2021-01
  • 2021-02
  • 2021-03
  • 2021-04
  • 2021-05
  • 2021-06
  • 2021-07
  • 2021-08
  • 2021-09
  • 2021-10
  • 2021-11
  • 2021-12
  • 2022-01
  • 2022-02
  • 2022-03
  • 2022-04
  • 2022-05
  • 2022-06
  • 2022-07
  • 2022-08
  • 2022-09
  • 2022-10
  • 2022-11
  • 2022-12
  • 2023-01
  • 2023-02
  • 2023-03
  • 2023-04
  • 2023-05
  • 2023-06
  • 2023-08
  • 2023-09
  • 2023-10
  • 2023-11
  • 2023-12
  • 2024-01
  • 2024-02
  • 2024-03
  • 2024-04
  • Forces generated by actomyosin networks within cells and for

    2018-10-20

    Forces generated by actomyosin networks within purchase Mdivi 1 and forces transmitted through intercellular adhesions are coordinated in driving self-organized tissue morphogenesis (Heisenberg and Bellaiche, 2013). We determine that retinal organoid morphogenesis is mediated by ROCK-regulated actomyosin-driven forces, based on the evidence that (1) pMYL2 and F-actin were polarized to the surfaces of cell sheets upon Dispase-mediated detachment; (2) inhibition of ROCK significantly downregulated or abolished the polarized expression of pMYL2, F-actin, TJP1, PRKCZ, and CDH2; and (3) myosin inhibitor blebbistatin or ROCK inhibitor Y27632 disrupted the self-organization of apically convex VSX2+ epithelium. ROCK exerted its roles during Dispase treatment, since a few retinal organoids still formed when Y27632 was added after Dispase treatment. In chick, Y27632 disrupts the invagination of optic vesicles as well as lens placode (Plageman et al., 2011), but it is unclear whether the phenotype in optic vesicles is directly caused by ROCK inhibition or indirectly by defective lens morphogenesis. In contrast to our findings described here and those of Plageman et al. (2011) in the chick, the spontaneous apical eversion of hESC-derived NR was not affected by ROCK inhibitor, but was disrupted by an antibody-neutralizing integrin signaling (Nakano et al., 2012). The eversion of mESC-derived NR showed phase-specific dependence on ROCK activity (Eiraku et al., 2011). Live imaging and molecular characterization demonstrate that retinal organoid morphogenesis described here differs from the apical eversion of hESC-derived NR (Nakano et al., 2012), which explains the difference in ROCK dependence. We conclude that ROCK-regulated actomyosin-driven forces are required for self-formation of the retinal organoids. The retinal organoids in cultures autonomously generated stratified retinal tissues. The findings described here and by others (Meyer et al., 2011; Reichman et al., 2014; Zhong et al., 2014) indicate that substantially pure VSX2+ epithelium has an intrinsic property to differentiate into stratified NR. Although outer segments were recently described (Zhong et al., 2014), there is still an unmet need for generating more mature outer segments. The retinal differentiation system established here for generating photoreceptors with maturing outer segments has multiple applications in modeling human retinal development and disease.
    Experimental Procedures
    Introduction Epithelial organs such as the kidney appear to have a constant number of cells once they reach maturity. When cells die, adjacent terminally differentiated cells might divide within the plane of the epithelial sheet to replace them, but work in many organs indicates that often a more specialized pool of progenitor/stem cells exist to serve this function. To date, robust identification of progenitor/stem cells has required markers that are present in them but not in their surrounding cells and that, in addition, allow identification of their progeny. The function of many of these markers was largely unknown (at least initially); some had been cytoskeletal proteins; e.g., keratins (Rock et al., 2009), others were surface receptors such as LGR5 (Barker et al., 2007) or members of CD family, and many had nothing to do with “stemness.” Yet, with genetic cell-lineage tracing they opened the way for the next leap in analytical power. Introduction of a genetic label under the control of the marker\'s promoter into the cells allowed identification of their in vivo location and, more significantly, permitted visualization of the contribution of single cells to multiple differentiated lineages in the same organ. Using this approach it was discovered that there appeared to be several stem cell pools in a given organ (Page et al., 2013; Donati and Watt, 2015); that there might be no obligatory hierarchy where a group of stem cells produced all differentiated subtypes during homeostasis (Sun et al., 2014), that there might be different stem cell pools that mediate homeostatic cell maintenance and organ regeneration (Tian et al., 2011; Mascré et al., 2012; Vaughan et al., 2015), and that injury can change lineage-restricted progenitor cells so that they become true stem cells (Ito et al., 2007; van Es et al., 2012).